If Jerry Jones is the most outspoken NFL owner, then Mike
Brown is the most stupid. At the NFL’s
recent annual meetings in Arizona, it appeared that Mike Brown was both acting
as though he was Cincinnati’s Moses who would rescue the city from its years of
mediocrity, while also lambasting its fans for acting too “spoiled.” It would
have been in Brown’s best interest, for once, to do what he has been doing with
his football team for the last decade – nothing.
Brown admitted in Paul Dehner Jr.'s article in the Cincinnati Enquirer that the hire of
Zac Taylor as the new head coach “was the biggest change in one year in the
history of the franchise.” Considering this is Brown’s now eighth head coach
since he inherited the title of “Owner of the Bengals” from his late father, it
wouldn’t appear that the hiring of a new head coach would constitute the
greatest change in the history of the franchise. Then again Brown is
eighty-three years old. Although he is
not the oldest owner in the NFL, he does appear to be the one owner who may
have the highest probability of being deemed incapacitated.
At the annual meeting, Brown would later tell reporters that
“[the Bengals] have gone through a tremendous revival.” This may be Brown’s
senile mind escaping his mouth again because in all likelihood the Bengals, at
least this season, won’t have a revival. First history and, yes, science has
indicated that coaching changes do not produce better results the year after
the coaching change occurred. In Jon Wertheim and Sam Sommer’s book titled, This is Your Brain on Sports, they noted
Middle Tennessee State University’s professor’s, Michael Roach, study on the
effects of NFL coaching changes. “According to Roach’s model, a team that fired
its coach reduced its win total the following year by 0.8 victories. The team’s
point differential decreased by 27 points. Its odds of making the playoffs
dropped by 12 percent.” Regardless of the merits of this study, on paper it
would be hard for one not to have to squint to find the talent on this Bengals
roster.
After Mike Brown was done with his self-promotion stint, he
then started to take aim at the very people who keep this, to the rest of
America, irrelevant franchise, well, relevant – the fans. For instance, Brown
went on some tangent about how the fans complain about the concession prices.
“[T]hey will say why don’t you do what they do in Atlanta what they do with
cheap hot dogs. They have cheap prices, but they charge for tickets about three
times what we charge. Which would you rather have?” I’m not sure what, or even if Brown knows,
what he is trying to accomplish with this rhetoric. Considering that the
Cincinnati Bengals fans still show up to a team who has routinely underachieved,
and the fact that those fans have started a website called, mikebrownsucks.com, it would seem in
Brown’s best interest to try and take some interest in his fans.
There are two more remarks that Brown made in his interview with
reports while in Arizona. The first was the fact that he admitted that fans
were right in wanting change. It may be Brown’s senile mind coming into play,
but a first time visitor to a Bengals game could have told you that the fans
wanted a head coaching change about five years ago. The very fact that Brown,
acting with the same muster as some paternal master over his fans, has to grant
the fans a sense of being “right” to want change is a slap in the face to the
very people who have been supporting Brown’s livelihood since ’91. The second
quote that made my jaw drop was when Brown, with the same sense as a blind man
suddenly being able to see, stated, “[i]t is remarkable how fast these problems
get resolved if you start winning.” Hopefully every reporter, when recording
this statement, suddenly put down their pencils and said in unison, “no duh.”
For a man who has owned a team for over a quarter of century, this “idea”
should have appeared to be a “no brainer.” The fact that this suddenly came
into Brown’s head is the very reason why the Bengals are in the position they
are in now – a mess.
P.S. At the annual meeting, the owners voted, 31-1 to allow
offensive and defensive pass interference to be subject to a coach’s challenge
and review (spurred by the 2018 NFC Championship Game). The lone dissent was
none other than the senile Mike Brown. There is a good chance he had no idea
what he was voting for.
No comments:
Post a Comment