By Kris Mead
The Hue Jackson and, to a lesser extent, the Todd Haley
divorce was expected. Jackson was underperforming in all areas, specifically in
player development, game management, and of course, the lack of wins. Todd
Haley was let go for the similar reasons. However, what ultimately got both
Jackson and Haley terminated was the simple fact that there was a constant
power struggle and outright disregard for chain of command.
Many are reporting that the firings were in the best
interest of the young quarterback – Baker Mayfield. Mayfield is like the child
in a divorce proceeding, in which the judge must consider the child’s best
interest when deciding custody. I agree with this thought, but I also believe
that the entire team could be considered a child and was at risk of regressing,
if the parents were not separated in a timely manner.
The Browns have the second youngest team in the NFL and have
been in the top two youngest teams in the past three seasons. Like a child
learning to speak his parents’ native tongue, it’s vital that these players are
provided excellent coaching in their early NFL years. It becomes especially
more vital when the Browns spend, not only the first-round draft pick, but the
first overall draft pick on the most difficult position to play in the NFL –
quarterback. It isn’t any quarterback though; Baker Mayfield has the potential
of being the Browns’ answer to their long drought at that position. In turn, it
is extremely important that the Browns do not squander this opportunity.
However, it’s ironic that focus has turned to Baker’s success.
At the beginning of the season Jackson stated that Tyrod Taylor, the
quarterback they traded for in exchange for a third-round pick, was to be the
starting quarterback. So Browns’ fans were not initially expecting to see their
number one draft choice start. Now that Taylor’s injuries forced Mayfield to
start, Cleveland has seen sparks of life coming out of a position that has been
typically occupied by mindless morons. Cleveland’s only priority is (and should be)
to prevent anything and anyone from tampering with Mayfield’s talent. Jackson
implementing Mayfield casted Jackson’s own demise. Once it became clear that a
quarterback with talent is not improving, the blame should be pointed at the
man with a 3-36-1 record. Jackson had nowhere to run, and although he tried to
use Haley’s offensive play calling as the culprit for the offenses’ failings,
due to his lack of credibility, and his failure to manage a football team,
there was no choice but for Hue to leave. Haley’s firing was more surprising.
Yes, the offense was lacking, but there is also some logic in maintaining some
source of consistency on the offensive side of the ball. Mayfield seemed to
favor Haley’s play calling more than Hue’s, as Mayfield even hinted in a
post-game interview, when Hue suggested he’d integrate himself more into the
offense, by stating “we don’t need to reinvent the wheel.”
I think Haley was on a short leash (as he should be) due to his
own power struggles with Hue. So, ownership suggested that Haley would be the
interim head coach, but Haley, acting in his typical egomaniac manner, probably
wanted to be named the head coach right then and there. Ownership, seeing that
Haley was in no position to negotiate his employment status, let Haley go on
the spot. Likely, Haley would have been let go at the end of the season.
Regardless of what the discussions were like prior to either
coach’s dismissal, it was obvious that the Browns were set up to be
dysfunctional as soon as John Dorsey was hired. While It’s hard to imagine
Dorsey not opting for a quarterback as his first overall draft pick, the only question
was which quarterback. So no matter what,
the team’s main focus would have been developing the quarterback. Like the
Haslams, Dorsey might have been hoodwinked into thinking that Jackson could
develop a young quarterback. After all,
Jackson coached Joe Flacco in his first two years in Baltimore. Still, that would be complete negligence on
Dorsey’s part. Jackson has utterly failed as a head coach, not just royally in
Cleveland, but he also struggled in Oakland. To make matters worse, it was
thought a good idea to hire an offensive coordinator in combative personality
Todd Haley to help solve the issues on offense, because the “offensive guru,”
whom the Browns’ hired as head coach, could not fix them for the past two
years.
In short let’s recap the Browns hiring in the past year.
Haslam hires an extremely talented General Manager in John Dorsey (good hire).
For some reason, Dorsey is not permitted to bring in his own head coach, like
most general managers do, and must settle with the owner’s guy, who has
consistently failed at his duties – Hue Jackson (bad management decision). The
other option is that Dorsey has had zero experience in being the guy who hires
a head coach. In his only other stint as a general manager, for the Kansas City
Chiefs, Dorsey was hired AFTER Andy Reid,
the head coach, was hired. So, the Browns hired a GM who is allowed to draft
his preferred quarterback but IS NOT
ALLOWED, or appears to be not allowed, to hire his preferred head coach who
will be responsible for developing said quarterback. However, Dorsey IS permitted to hire an offensive coordinator, who will only rub
the egotistical head coach the wrong way. The hired offensive coordinator is
also an egomaniac who believes he is the “ultimate offensive guru.”
The Browns’ owner, Jimmy Haslam, couldn’t have created a
more perfect storm for dysfunction to thrive and his young quarterback to
suffer. While it was good of Haslam to mitigate any more damage by getting rid
of Haley and Jackson, considering he’s largely the source of Cleveland’s
management mess, it’s the least the owner could do. Haslam should pay more attention to his IRS
scandal and the new soccer team he owns. Let the only smart guy in the room
make decisions – John Dorsey. Maybe Haslam should take the Hippocratic Oath or
more specifically, “primum non nocere” or “first do no harm.”
No comments:
Post a Comment