In a moment of desperation and boredom I tuned into the
World Cup. This game, or I should say, the “match” was between extremely
talented Spain and extremely untalented, and host nation, Russia. The game was
tied one to one when I tuned in at the 79th minute. The game
continued to be tied at the 90th minute, which is the end of
“regulation.” However, the “match” was still knotted up even after the “extra
minutes” were added on (for those who may not know, “extra minutes” are
determined by the amount of time, during regulation, where soccer was not being
played, but the clock was running). Still, a winner was still not decided, even
after “overtime” (which is two 15 minute periods of extra time). So the
“match” concluded with penalty kicks, in which each team has five tries to
score penalty kicks against the opposing team’s goalie. Here, Spain missed more
penalty kicks than Russia and so Russia won. In the end the football match was
decided in a way that was not really “football” and it felt wrong.
First it is understandable as to why the founders of soccer
decided that penalty kicks must be the last alternative to how a tied match
should be resolved, as the game has to end some time. Essentially Russia and
Spain played most of the game without any scores occurring. For much of the time nothing remotely
competitive was going on on the field, other than Spain passing the ball to each other
in the middle of the field and nowhere in the vicinity of the Russian goalie.
On the other hand, Russia, it seemed, had a simple strategy – push the game to
penalty kicks. In other words, Russia knew they athletically had no shot at
beating Spain in the course of the traditional style of soccer. So, Russia’s best shot at a win was by defeating
Spain in penalty. In short, Russia knew it could not beat Spain at soccer, but
knew it had a chance at beating Spain in a different form of competition, a
form of competition not resembling soccer – penalty kicks.
My argument is that penalty kicks, to determine a victor
once overtime has been exhausted, should be removed. This is because it
provides an incentive for offensively inferior teams, like Russia, to put all
their chips in playing only defense and no incentive to play decent offense.
Further, although this was a “major” upset in soccer, it wasn’t a real upset.
This is because penalty kicks remove nearly all the parameters that create the soccer
identity. Essentially penalty kicks are
a different game entirely from soccer. They remove all defenses, all offense,
and simply make the goalie guess which way the shooter decides to kick the
ball. So while on paper it would look as though Russia bettered Spain in soccer,
Russia actually played much worse than Spain in all statistical analysis of the
game, except for “penalty kicks.” Penalty kicks are the equivalent to a game of “Monopoly”
that has been going on for a while and both players are tied. In order to break
the monopoly tie, the two real estate moguls decide to each roll one dice and
whoever rolls higher wins the game. However, all reasonable minds can conclude
that although rolling of the dice is a crucial part of the board game, it alone
is not the game itself.
The solution is to alter the game, but keep its context
still alive, so that the victor can confidently claim that they beat the other
team at soccer. The most advantageous and equitable alternative would be to
remove players from the field, once regulation has concluded. So there are
eleven soccer players per team on the field during regulation, if the game goes to
overtime, the game should be brought down to seven players on each side. Yes,
this would give an advantage to the more skilled team, but the more skilled
team had the same proportionate advantage as to when there were eleven players.
In turn, what this does is provide those skilled players more space as to
create a shot. This proposal allows the soccer game to be decided within the form
and framework of soccer, rather than some other game entirely, called “penalty
kicks.”
… American football can’t come soon enough…
No comments:
Post a Comment